For EHS consultants

Defensible P&ID-to-component traceability for every compliance engagement.

EHS consultants sign the deliverable. When an EPA auditor asks where a specific component count came from, the answer has to trace back to a specific drawing, on a specific revision, at a specific location on the drawing. Armeta produces that traceability by construction.

Book a demo Start with a P&ID audit

The EHS consultant problem

Compliance evidence is only as good as the drawing it came from.

Every LDAR component inventory, every PHA documentation package, every PSM audit defense rests on the governing P&IDs. When a consultant produces a component list, a regulator can and will ask where every entry came from. “We read it off the drawings” is not an answer. “Here is the specific region on revision 7 of drawing P-1204 where this valve appears” is.

The manual approach to this — LDAR technicians reading drawings, transcribing into spreadsheets, reconciling with field walkdowns — produces deliverables that pass most audits but fail the hard ones. The gap between “we think this is right” and “we can prove this is right” is where consulting practices lose clients and win lawsuits.

Three engagements

Three engagement types, one extraction engine.

LDAR program implementation and audit defense

Today

LDAR consultants build component inventories from P&IDs, field walkdowns, and client-supplied databases (LeakDAS, Guideware, etc.). The reconciliation between these sources is manual, time-consuming, and the point where most audit findings originate. EPA's Leak Detection and Repair: A Best Practices Guide specifically identifies drawing-to-component misalignment as a source of noncompliance.

With Armeta

A structured component inventory extracted directly from the governing P&IDs, with every entry tied to its source drawing and source region. The LDAR database can be reconciled against an authoritative graph. Audit findings on inventory completeness become defensible.

PHA and HAZOP documentation engagements

Today

HAZOP teams require current P&IDs and Process Safety Information at study kickoff. PSI packages are often stale, incomplete, or diverge from actual field conditions. The consultant spends the first portion of the engagement reconciling PSI against reality before the hazard analysis can begin.

With Armeta

Current, structured P&IDs with revision deltas pre-flagged. PSI reconciliation happens before the HAZOP team arrives on site. The consultant's engineering hours shift from documentation prep to actual hazard analysis work.

PSM audit support and documentation

Today

PSM audit preparation involves assembling evidence across fourteen regulatory elements, most of which reference the governing P&IDs at some point. MOC documentation, PSI completeness, mechanical integrity records, incident investigations — all trace back to drawings. Proving the drawings are current is the hardest part of any audit.

With Armeta

Every P&ID in the audit scope is structured, versioned, and delta-compared. The evidence package for every PSM element that touches a drawing is drawing-traceable by construction.

Evidence

Deployed today, where your data lives.

Proof

Drawing-traceable evidence, produced today.

Armeta is currently producing P&ID-to-component traceability on active LDAR and PHA engagements. External validation on the record: first place at CERAWeek 2026 Energy Venture Day, Industrial Efficiency and Decarbonization track.

See the full proof page

Deployment

Where the audit record already lives.

Cloud, on-premise, or private cloud. Deployed under client data residency and audit-trail requirements. SOC 2 Type II audit in progress, completing H1 2026.

Security and deployment

Your drawings, your data

Start with ten of your own drawings.

See Armeta produce drawing-traceable component inventories on your own engagement drawings. A structured report in one engagement — before any procurement conversation.

Book a demo Start a P&ID audit